Life Insurance and Estate Costs: A Smarter Way to Create Liquidity

Why pre-planning with properly structured coverage can help families avoid forced sales, costly borrowing, and value destruction when taxes come due.

By Thomas J. Perrone, CLU, CIC

If most of your wealth is tied up in real estate, a family business, or long-term investments, your estate can be “asset-rich but cash-poor.” The challenge is that estate taxes and transfer costs can come due quickly—often before heirs have time to sell assets thoughtfully or arrange financing

The overlooked question in estate planning

For many business owners and high-net-worth families, estate planning focuses on what will be transferred and to whom. Just as important is the practical question that determines whether a plan works in real life: Where will the cash come from to pay estate taxes and other transfer costs—on time?

The issue is rarely a lack of wealth. It’s a lack of liquidity—and a very real deadline.

One of the most effective ways to solve this problem is also one of the most misunderstood: using life insurance to fund estate taxes and transfer expenses efficiently, without forcing the sale of long-term assets.

The real problem: a deadline and a liquidity crunch

Estate taxes and transfer costs are not optional—and they don’t wait. In many cases, they must be paid within nine months of death.

That timeline can create a liquidity crunch when a large share of an estate is tied up in:

  • Real estate
  • Privately held businesses
  • Illiquid investments

When the calendar and the balance sheet don’t line up, families can be pushed into expensive decisions at exactly the wrong time.

Four ways estates typically cover the bill

Most estates end up using one (or a combination) of the following approaches to cover taxes and transfer costs.

1) Cash on hand

It’s simple—but it can be inefficient. Holding large amounts of cash can mean giving up long-term growth and flexibility. For many families, keeping millions in low-yield accounts “just in case” isn’t realistic.

2) Forced sale of assets

When liquidity isn’t available, families may have to sell assets quickly to meet the nine-month deadline.

Imagine being forced to sell:

  • A commercial property
  • A family business
  • Land or long-held investments

…all on a tight timeline.

That can lead to a fire sale—assets sold below market value—eroding wealth that may have taken decades to build.

3) Financing the tax bill

Another option is borrowing money to pay the estate taxes.

Borrowing can preserve assets, but it introduces new risks and costs, including:

  • Interest costs
  • Long-term debt obligations
  • Uncertainty around loan approval

Financing may preserve assets, but interest and repayment terms can drive the total cost well beyond the tax liability. And credit availability can tighten at exactly the wrong time.

4) Life insurance (a strategic liquidity solution)

This is where planning changes everything.

When life insurance is owned by a properly structured trust, it can create liquidity exactly when it’s needed—without disrupting the investment portfolio, the business, or the family’s long-term plan.

A real-world example

Consider this scenario:

  • Age: 59
  • Net worth: $15.5 million
  • Projected estate value: $46 million

The estimated tax bill: $18.6 million due within nine months.

Now compare the cost of each strategy:

  • Cash: forfeits future earning potential on the dollars held back
  • Forced sale: can exceed $20 million when assets must be sold at a discount
  • Financing: approximately $23 million over time, depending on rates and terms
  • Life insurance: about $4.8 million in total cost in this example

That’s roughly 74% less expensive than the next best option.

Why life insurance often comes out ahead

Life insurance stands out for several key reasons:

Cost efficiency

Properly designed coverage can provide required liquidity at a fraction of the cost of holding idle cash, selling assets under pressure, or borrowing.

Tax advantages

  • Death benefits are generally income tax-free
  • Can be structured outside the taxable estate

Predictability

Unlike market-based holdings, a policy’s death benefit is designed to be available on a known event, with no market-timing risk.

  • No volatility
  • No timing risk
  • Guaranteed payout when needed

Potentially strong effective returns

Depending on age, underwriting, and product design, the internal rate of return on a death benefit can be attractive (often cited at 10%+ in illustrations), with a potentially higher tax-equivalent return depending on your bracket.

The power of pre-planning

One of the most important insights is this:

Life insurance isn’t just an expense—it can be a pre-funded liquidity solution.

With current tax laws, individuals may have the ability to:

  • Gift funds into a trust
  • Avoid gift taxes within certain limits
  • Systematically fund a future tax obligation

This transforms a reactive problem into a proactive strategy.

Final thoughts

Estate planning isn’t just about transferring wealth—it’s about preserving it.

Without proper planning, families may be forced into:

  • Selling valuable assets
  • Taking on debt
  • Losing a significant portion of their legacy

Life insurance offers a smarter alternative:

  • Lower cost
  • Greater certainty
  • Minimal disruption to your estate

Bottom line

If you expect your estate to face taxes or transfer costs, the real question isn’t if you’ll pay—it’s how.

And as the numbers clearly show:

For many families, life insurance is often the most efficient way to do it.

Work with your estate planning attorney, CPA, and insurance advisor to model the expected estate tax exposure, test different liquidity strategies, and determine whether a trust-owned policy fits your objectives and timeline.

WordPress notes (optional): Meta description: Estate taxes can be due within nine months, creating a liquidity crunch for families with illiquid assets. Learn four common strategies—and why trust-owned life insurance can be a cost-efficient solution.

Suggested slug: life-insurance-estate-tax-liquidity

Download your free reportThe Big Beautiful Bill Tax Change Guide – this guide will help you understand all the opportunities this tax bill has offered to business owners.

www.bpbpgrp.com

tperrone@necgginc.com

 

One Big Beautiful Bill

By Thomas J. Perrone, CLU, CIC

This video will give you a good idea of the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, and the strategies that can be employed for the long-term planning

The Trump Administration made life much easier in preserving legacy  for everyone.

If you wish to discuss any of this with me, please use my calendar link

Overview of the BBB and Planning Options and Strategies!

For Advisors and For Business Owners to Utilize. 

Tom covers some of the major areas of the bill, emphasizing income tax reduction and estate exclusion and estate shifting.  He urges estate owners to do planning now  and avoid delaying because although the BBB is now law, it can be changed by congress in the future.  Use it while you have it!

 

https://youtu.be/OgkPRr3JrDE?si=ajHUjvb5fi_hf9xZ

 

For overview of the BBB, click for a download

https://www.allclients.com/Form3.aspx?Key=78B769D475F542B7E20799CD205B9205

tperrone@necgginc.com

Using A SLAT with Life Insurance 

BY: Thomas J. Perrone, CLU, CIC 

Since 2017 the SPOUSAL LIFETIME ACCESS TRUSTS (SLAT) have been an exceptionally good planning tool, and a popular one in sheltering the growth of assets from estate taxation.  

With the event of up and coming “the sunset” in 2026, more attention has been given to using this planning tool.  

In this video, I discuss not only what a SLAT is, and how it is used, but bring into play the arbitraging of life insurance, and the powerful results from using it.  

It is suggested that the planner learn as much as possible about the use of the SLAT.  Also, the planner should work with a qualified attorney when presenting and implementing this planning technique.   

Free__ YOUR SUNSET PLANNING GUIDE –   CLICK THIS LINK FOR FREE DOWNLOAD 

Tperrone@necgginc.com  

Beneficiary Designations Can Become Very Critical Errors in Your Estate Planning!

 

June  2021  

Beneficiary Designations Can Become Very Critical Errors in Your Estate Planning!   

In all of the years that I have serviced my client’s planning their estates, one of the most important areas of the planning is making sure they are aware of the beneficiaries of their property.   

Many times, they have older life insurance and annuity contracts which haven’t been reviewed over the years, consequently, their family dynamics may have changed, and updating is necessary.  

The life insurance beneficiary and estate beneficiary are not exclusive to the planning.  Other property should always align with the overall planning, however, in this article, I want to focus on some of the pitfalls in naming beneficiaries, as this is, in my opinion, the most common mistake made in planning, not updating beneficiaries.i   

  1. Not thinking about the financial ability of the beneficiary to handle the inheritance they will receive. For example, they could be minors, incapacitated, or just uniformed in their thinking about finances, a bad marriage, and a host of other situations.  That being the case, a trust makes sense as they are flexible to design and can be amended over time. 
  1.  They are an adult, but you just don’t have the confidence that leaving a large sum of money to them is the right thing to do. Example:  leaving $500,000 to a 21-year-old son.  This will usually end up being a nightmare.  Again, a trust can be a great vehicle to control the outcome of paying the lump sum directly. 
  1. Leaving a large amount of money to your elderly sibling, or parents.  They are usually next in line to have to deal with the Medicaid system.  There are other ways of leaving the property to help them for future income and lifestyle needs, which will not jeopardize the asset to the Medicaid system.  
  1. Not naming contingent beneficiaries.  Should the primary beneficiary listed not be living at your death, the assets will pass to your estate versus to the next in line.  Naming contingent beneficiaries guarantees that should your primary beneficiary not be living at your death; the contingent beneficiaries will receive the assets.   
  1. Not naming “per stirpes” to your beneficiaries if you want your beneficiaries’ issues to receive the asset, should the beneficiary not be living.  Example, leaving asset to your child, if living, if not living, to their issues (your grandchildren).  

Tax ramifications are important also, Example, you want your two children to receive $125,000 each from your $250,000 IRA.  Child A has little income and is in the 12% income tax bracket.  They will pay $15,000 in taxes (Fed). Child B is a professional making over $450,000 a year.  They will pay much more in taxes, example 35% or $157,000.1 

Child A will pay $15,000 taxes on the IRA and net:  $110,000 and $150,000 (life insurance) = $260,000 

Child B will pay $37,500 taxes on the IRA and net $87,500 and $150,000 (life insurance) = $237,000 

In this case, more of the IRA could be left to child a with less tax than child b up to $329,000 before they hit the 24% tax bracket.  The equalizer would be to leave more of the life insurance tax free payment to child b, and less of the taxable IRA.  When you work it out, you would help save taxes on the IRA by 11%.   

There are many more Pitfalls which I can share with you, however, these seem to be the most common ones that I run into.   

For a free report on “Six Biggest Mistakes When Setting up A living Trust;” Requestion Report #9 in the Drop-Down menu>. We will send it to you immediately.   

To get your Report #9; “Six Biggest Mistakes When Setting up A living Trust”.  

CLICK Here:         FREE REPORT, Make sure to request report #9 on the drop-down menu.