Tag: Agreements

The Cheapest Way to Fund a Buy-Sell Agreement

by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Business Growth and Transition, Buy and Sell Agreements, Company Wealth, Estate Planning, Funding your Buy and Sell, Income from your business, Inside Sale, Life Insurance, Selling Your Business

By Thomas J. Perrone, CLU, CIC

Picture this: you and your business partner built something real together. Four million dollars in value, split fifty-fifty. Then, out of nowhere, your partner passes away. His widow now owns half your company. She doesn’t want to run it. She wants her money — now.

If that thought makes your stomach drop, you’re not alone. And here’s the uncomfortable truth: having a buy-sell agreement doesn’t mean you’re actually prepared for this moment.

Your Buy-Sell Agreement Is Only Half the Plan

Most business owners think a buy-sell agreement has them covered. It names a price. It names the terms. It says, in black and white, what happens when a partner leaves — through death, disability, divorce, or simply deciding to walk away.

But an agreement is only the what. It says nothing about the how. How does the money actually move from the surviving owner’s pocket into the widow’s hands? That question is where most buy-sell arrangements quietly fail — not in a courtroom, but at the bank, when it turns out the cash simply isn’t there.

Without a funded plan, owners are usually left with one of three bad outcomes:

– A fire sale — the business gets sold fast, often to a stranger, just to raise the cash.

– A forced partnership — you end up running the company with someone who never wanted to be your partner.

– The bank calls the loans — lenders get nervous about ownership uncertainty and tighten the noose.

None of that is good. And all of it is avoidable — if you fund the agreement properly, ahead of time.

The Three Ways to Fund a Buyout

Let’s use a simple example: a $4 million business, owned 50/50, with a $2 million buyout obligation. There are three real ways to cover that number.

Option 1: Cash

The instinct for a lot of owners is to just save up. Sounds responsible enough — until you run the numbers.

If your business generates $400,000 a year in distributable profit, split evenly, that’s $200,000 per partner. To fully self-fund a $2 million buyout, you’d need to set aside your entire share of profit for ten years. No raises. No reinvestment. No growth. Just money sitting there, doing nothing, in case the worst happens.

And here’s the problem nobody wants to say out loud: what if the event happens in year two? You’re $200,000 into a $2 million obligation, and your business has spent two years running on fumes because all its profit was parked in a savings account instead of working.

Cash funding only works in one scenario: if you never actually need it. The moment you do, it’s never enough.

Option 2: Borrowing

The next instinct is to borrow — a bank loan, or a note payable to the estate over time.

On a $2 million buyout, financed over ten years at 7%, you’re looking at roughly $28,000 a month. Over the life of that loan, total interest adds up to about $800,000 — money that leaves your business permanently and goes straight to the bank.

And the interest isn’t even the biggest problem. Borrowed money comes with strings: personal guarantees, the business pledged as collateral, and payments due no matter what — recession or not, lost customers or not. On top of that, a departing partner’s estate has little reason to accept a slow note when the agreement says they’re owed full value now. Notes get renegotiated. Disputes happen. And the business you’re trying to protect ends up in court anyway.

Cash starves the business. Debt mortgages it. Which brings us to the option that actually works.

Option 3: Life Insurance

Here’s the idea, and it’s refreshingly simple. You take out a life insurance policy on your partner. The business — or a properly structured trust — owns the policy and pays the premium. When your partner passes away, the death benefit arrives tax-free, within weeks. That’s your buyout, fully funded, on the spot. No fire sale. No note. No bank involved.

For a healthy partner in his fifties, a $2 million death benefit typically costs somewhere between $20,000 and $40,000 a year in premium, depending on how it’s structured.

Now compare that to the alternatives:

| Funding Method | Cost Profile | Key Risk |

  1. Cash (self-funded) | $200K/yr of profit for 10 years | Starves the business; badly exposed if the event happens early |
  2. Borrowing | ~$28K/mo; ~$800K in total interest | Collateral, personal guarantees, payments due regardless of performance |
  3. Life Insurance (trust-owned) | ~$20K–$40K/yr premium; full coverage from day one | Requires correct ownership structure and an insurable partner |

The number that tends to get people’s attention: a trust-owned life insurance approach runs roughly 74% less expensive than the next best option. And unlike cash, the coverage is fully in place from day one — not after a decade of saving.

How to Structure the Policy

Once you’ve decided insurance is the right tool, you still have to structure it correctly. There are two standard approaches.

Cross-purchase agreement. Each partner personally owns a policy on the other. When one dies, the survivor collects the death benefit and buys the deceased partner’s shares directly. Simple, clean, and it works especially well with two partners.

Entity purchase (stock redemption). The business itself owns the policies and buys back shares from the deceased partner’s estate. This tends to be easier to administer when there are three or more partners involved.

Which one is right depends on your entity type. C-corporations can run into alternative minimum tax issues under certain structures. S-corporations raise their own questions around ownership and basis. This is exactly the kind of decision that shouldn’t come from a template you found online — the structure you choose has tax consequences that can follow your family for a generation.

The Advanced Move: Trust-Owned Insurance and Key Person Coverage

If you want to do this the smart way, there’s a more sophisticated layer worth knowing about.

Irrevocable life insurance trusts. Instead of you or the business owning the policy, a trust owns it. Why bother? Two reasons. First, it keeps the death benefit out of your taxable estate — for owners with real net worth, that can mean millions in estate tax the family never has to pay. Second, the trust controls the timing and terms of the payout, so the proceeds go out exactly as the agreement says, instead of becoming a bargaining chip.

Key person insurance. This is a different tool entirely — it protects the business, not the ownership transfer. If you’ve got a key employee who runs operations or holds your most important customer relationships, their death would hit the business hard: lost revenue, lost relationships, a scramble to replace them. Key person coverage puts cash into the business to bridge that gap. It’s not for the buyout. It’s for survival. Any business with roughly five to fifty employees should have this on the radar.

Four Mistakes That Cost Owners the Most

1. Buying term insurance that expires. Buy-sell needs are permanent — you can’t predict the year something happens. Permanent coverage is the honest answer.

2. Getting the policy ownership wrong. If the person who owns the policy isn’t the same person who owes the buyout, the death benefit can trigger a tax problem and defeat the whole plan.

3. Letting the valuation go stale. The agreement says $4 million, but the business is now worth $9 million. That’s not a plan anymore — it’s a time bomb.

4. Assuming your partner is insurable. If there’s a health issue, you want to know now, while you can still get coverage — not after it’s too late.

What to Do This Week

You don’t need to overhaul everything today. Start here:

1. Pull your buy-sell agreement and ask the honest question: is this actually funded, or does it just look funded on paper?

2. Get a life insurance illustration on your partner. Just the numbers — no commitment required.

3. Have the conversation with your partner. It’s awkward, sure. But it’s a lot less awkward than the widow, the fire sale, or the bank calling your loans.

A buy-sell agreement is only as good as its funding. Of the three options — cash, borrowing, and life insurance — insurance, especially when trust-owned, is the one that’s cheapest, fastest, and most reliable when it actually matters. Get the funding question answered now, while everyone’s calm and thinking clearly, so the only thing left to work out later is the number.

Download your free BSA report Guide-  CLICK HERE

Check This Article called “Connolly Alternatives: 

Need to discuss:  Toms Calendar. 

Case Study: Rapid Sales Growth and Ownership

by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Business Growth and Transition, Buy and Sell Agreements, Company Wealth, Estate Planning, Funding your Buy and Sell, Key People_Or Group, Strategies of growing business, Valuation, Working On Your Business

Case Example Using Term Insurance

By Thomas J. Perrone, CLU, CIC

This was a situation where the company needed protection but wasn’t ready to purchase permanent insurance, even though the situation called for it.  However, the term insurance gave them what they wanted at the time and gave them the needed protection. 

Scenario: 

 A thriving business, comprising three partners—a relationship builder, an idea generator, and a product engineer—experienced remarkable sales growth within a few years. However, a potential challenge arose regarding ownership transfer upon a partner’s death, as all partners shared familial ties. 


To mitigate this concern, a comprehensive stock redemption program was devised and funded through a term insurance policy with a premium exceeding $60,000. This strategic approach enabled the business to navigate ownership transfer complexities and ensure the continuity of its operations.

Through the years, parts of the term insurance has been converted, and the company is paying about $125,000 in insurance premium to fund their liabilities and commitment.  

The case was developed through a relationship i had with one of the owners, through an introduction.  

Lesson:  

Even though this was a start up and a young company, if I has assumed it did not have the cash flow, I would have lost out on all the great potential.  Don’t assume anything, but let your client tell you what they want and why. 

THE WHY: 

There was a past history of the one of the current partners where their family member was part of a company where the partner died.  No planning was done, so the deceased partners family became the new partners.  This was not pretty, and the business ended up in chaos.  Obviously, a motivating factor for the current owner to have a good Buy and Sell Agreement where it was funded 

If you are an advisor who is working with business owners or wants to develop a business market segment in your practice, we should talk. We offer great opportunities working with our organization and deep backup.  

Thomas J. Perrone, CLU, CIC

tperrone@necgginc.com

Single Appraiser vs. Multiple Appraiser Choices

by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Buy and Sell Agreements, Company Wealth, evaluations, Funding your Buy and Sell, Selling Your Business, Uncategorized, Valuation, Working On Your Business

This month I wrote about multiple and single Appraiser choice.  My friend Ed Pratesi was nice enough to give me some of his thoughts, which I definitely respect due to his experience and training.   Ed, thank you for this contribution.

Ed Pratesi wrote:

I read with interest your comments on Single Appraiser vs. Multiple Appraiser choices that owners have for a BSA. I agree in part with your assessment that the single appraiser choice is preferred but I do have a number of caveats and suggest that before the number of appraisers needed is secondary to choices made before this decision. Let me explain my thoughts:

Firstly, the choice of number of appraisers almost always works, whether one, two or the three step approach – except when it doesn’t!

Prior to the determination of the number of appraisers needed is preceded by what I refer to as the education process that a business appraiser must take the owners through in order to develop an agreement and a process that will likely be triggered when an unanticipated or unfortunate event has occurred.

In never ceases to amaze me that owners will spend money on creating a business plan, invest in physical assets and talent and not spend enough time on one of the most important events that will occur in their lives – either their exit or a partners exit. My complaint is not pointed at the owners but at the appraiser called in to initially called in to assist in the valuation.

My point simply is the an appraiser needs to explain the valuation process, the valuation methods used to value a business, the applicability or not of the methods to the company, a discussion of the definition of value – (for example fair market value or fair value, more on this in a later discussion), a complete discussion of adjustments that appraiser consider in the valuation process, and what discounts could apply and the reasons for application of discounts.

This part of the valuation process is more consultative and sets the framework for the conduct of an initial appraisal and of the work product. Finally, once the appraisal is complete a meeting to discuss the results and the process is essential and should be prefeaced with scenario planning should a provision of the BSA be triggered.

The goal is to get buy-in on the process not just the number!

I hope I have addressed part of the discussion of the number of appraisers – more to follow if desired…

Ed Pratesi

Edward E. Pratesi, ASA, CM&AA, ABV, CVA

Managing Director | UHY Advisors N.E., LLC
6 Executive Drive, Farmington, CT  06032
D: 860 519 5648 | C: 860 558 0453 | F: 860 519 1982

epratesi@uhy-us.com |  www.uhyvaluation.com

www.linkedin.com/in/ed-pratesi-140b762

 

Single appraiser Buy and Sell Agreement!

by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Buy and Sell Agreements, Company Wealth, evaluations, Funding your Buy and Sell, Selling Your Business, Valuation

An alternative to the multiple appraiser agreement, is the single appraiser agreement (SAA).  There are two single appraisers’ processes. I

  1. Single appraiser, select now and value now
  2. Single appraiser, Select and Value at Trigger Event
  3. Single appraiser, Select Now and Value at trigger event

The preference is #1:

However, #2,3 are stopgap processes which can be used.  As mentioned in both of these types, the value is delayed to sometime in the future. 

Postponement of the appraiser selection and initial valuation create substantial uncertainties and potential for disagreements   or disputes.

The SINGLE APPRAISER, SELECT NOW AND VALUE NOW OPTION

In the BSA, the appraiser is named and is engaged to provide an initial appraisal for purposes of the agreement.

SELECT NOW: At the creation of the BSA, the appraiser is named. All parties have a voice and can exercise their choice as difficult as it may be.

VALUE NOW:  The chosen appraiser provides a baseline appraisal for the purpose of the agreement.  In this method, it is recommended that the value be presented in draft and give each party a time period for consideration before entering it in the final BSA. 

VALUE EACH YEAR (OR TWO) THEREAFTER:  This provides great advantages:[i]

  • Structure and process
  • Known to all parities
  • Selected appraiser is viewed as independent
  • Values are seen before triggering event
  • Since a draft will be provided to the participants, they can review for corrections to the mutual satisfaction
  • The appraiser’s conclusion in known up front and is the price until the next appraisal, or until a trigger event
  • Because the process is exercised at least once, it should go smoothly when employed at trigger events, less time consuming and less expensive than other alternatives

The single valuation process also helps the estate planning process with the annual reappraisals which will facilitate the estate planning objectives of the shareholders. For example, if the planning calls for minority discounts, the supplemental valuations at the not marketable minority level for gift and estate purposes.

[i] This type of valuation process will accommodate most small companies as for many reasons listed above. 

 

Multiple Appraiser Valuation Agreements 

by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Buy and Sell Agreements, Company Wealth, Funding your Buy and Sell, Selling Your Business, Valuation

There are two types of appraiser valuation agreement (AVA). Multiple appraisers and single appraises, while the multiple appraisers (MAVA), are the most common.

How they worked

Usually the BSA calls for a 30-60-day window for the seller and buyer to attempt to agree upon a price.  Once the appraisal process is initiated, each party will select an appraiser.

The two will provide opinions of value conforming to the BSA.  If their value is within 10% of each other, then the final value will be the average of the two. 

If the two appraisals are more than 10%, they will agree on a third appraiser.  That appraiser will:

  1. Provide an appraisal is anaverage in the same way the other appraisers (reconciler)
  2. Provide an opinion regardless of theother two conclusions.

When BSA are triggered, the corporation and seller separate and go separate ways as there is different motivations. The seller wants the highest price, the purchaser, the lowest price.   A good reason why each party should reach an agreement on terms before there is a triggering event, where neither party will be as open minded as they were before a triggering event.

Even with appraisers it is possible that each side will be overseen by multiple sets of attorneys looking out for the interest of the various sides to the transaction.

  Thought Processes behind multiple appraisers’ agreements:   

Multiple appraisers are intended to bring reason and resolution to the valuation process. This does not always happen, because the parties have 30-60 window to get the appraisers and the evaluations completed.  This is more than enough time to irritate each other and taint the process, causing in some cases, the appraisals to be compromised.

Since most multiple appraiser agreements (MAA) base the third appraisal to be an average of the former two if within 10%.

Continue reading “Multiple Appraiser Valuation Agreements “ →

Life Insurance Proceeds In Business Valuations

by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Buy and Sell Agreements, Company Wealth, Funding your Buy and Sell, Uncategorized, Valuation

If life insurance proceeds are considered as the funding vehicle, then the proceeds of the policy received following the death of a shareholder would not be considered a corporate asset for valuation purposes.(1)

It would be recognized that it was purchased for a specific purpose of funding the buy-sell agreement (BSA). IF it were considered a corporate asset, it would offset the company’s liability to fund the purchase of shares, added back as a non- recurring expense.

Treatment 1: (used as a funding vehicle, not a company asset)

Example: A company with a $10m value, has two shareholders, owning 50% of the company. The company holds a $6m life insurance policy on each owner (assuming no alternative minimum tax issues).

RESULTS: At Shareholder #1’s death, the company collects $6m of life insurance benefits. The surviving partner will receive $10m company value, and $1m of net tax-free proceeds, a total of $11m value. The deceased stockholder receives the $5m for the business.

Treatment 2: (A corporate asset)

Treating the life insurance as corporate assets for valuation purposes.

The proceeds are treated as a non-operating asset of the company. This asset along with other net assets, would be available to fund the purchase the of shares the of a deceased shareholder. Keep in mind that the expense of the deceased stockholder might be added back into income as a nonrecurring expense.  (2)

The treatment type can have a significant effect on the net position of a company or selling shareholder. There is also an affect in the ability of the company to purchase the shares of the deceased stockholder, and impact of the position of the remaining shareholders.

Company $10m, before $6m of life insurance. When you add the $6m into the value, the company value is $16m. The deceased shareholder entitled to $8m, the company pays $6m in life insurance proceeds and takes out $2m in promissory note.

RESULTS: The surviving owner, owns a company with 8 million and a note of $2 million.

Which treatment is fair? One owner ends us with $11m while the deceased owner, ends up with $5m. In treatment 2, the surviving owner has to carry a $2m debt to purchase the business. Two dramatic differences. A good reason, why the discussion should take place with your advisors.

More importantly, all parties should understand the ramifications of adding the life insurance proceeds in the valuation or using the life insurance as a specific vehicle to fund the BSA.

——————————

1. Mercer: buy and sell agreements for boomers

2. Non-reoccurring expenses: Non-reoccurring expenses can be somewhat more complex. These are expenses which is  specifically  designated on the company’s financial statements as an extra ordinary or one time expense.  The company does not expect to continue the expense overtime, at least not on a regular basis. Non-reoccurring expenses can be somewhat more complex. 

The Interplay Between the Funding Mechanism And the Valuation? 

Featured by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Buy and Sell Agreements, Company Wealth, Funding your Buy and Sell, Selling Your Business, Uncategorized, Valuation

What happens when life insurance proceeds are part of the funding vehicle of a buy and sell agreement (BSA).    

 Example 

 When a stockholder owner dies and life insurance payments are made, is the valuation of the stock being redeemed as part of the value of the company?   

The way life insurance benefits are treated in the buy and sell agreement (BSA), could lead to different estate treatment and income tax.    In both areas, the results can be dramatic.     

 Does the agreement tell the appraisers how to treat the life insurance benefits in their valuation?  Does the agreement provide for the company to issue a promissory note to a deceased shareholder, and what are the terms? 

 Keep in mind, the agreement is no better than the ability of the parties and/or the company to fund any required purchases at the agreed upon price.    An agreement that is silent on this issue is like not having an agreement.  

 Life insurance  

 Generally, life insurance premiums are not deductible, and the pass through of non-deductibility can create pass-through income for the shareholders of S corporations, and the owners of partnerships and limited liability companies.  Knowing how to treat the life insurance premium for tax purposes would be important information for you.  We suggest you discuss this with your CPA.  

 Although the life insurance premium is not deductible, the death benefits generally are tax- free, notwithstanding the alternate minimum tax treatment for C corps.  

Keep in mind the funding mechanism is not actually necessary to define the engagement for valuation purposes and has nothing to do with appraisal standards or qualifications. It provides the funding for the company to afford the value, and to make sure the selling stockholder receives the value.  In essence, it’s the mechanism to fund the liability of the contract, or at least part of it.   

Wants and Needs of the Buyer and the Seller- The normal push and pull!  

The seller wants the highest price and the buyer wants the lowest price.   Without a doubt the best time to set the price would be prior to a triggering event, when both parties are in parity and neither is the subject of the trigger.  It is the best time when both parties will be the most reasonable in setting the rules of the agreements as they are both fair minded in the negotiations.   

 Funding Methods 

  1. Life Insurance:  In most cases life insurance will be the most inexpensive method for funding the death benefit part of the agreement, when comparing, self funding, and loans (including corporate promissory notes) to fund the liability, notwithstanding the ability to get a funding loan from a loaning institution.    In most of the comparisons I have done over the years, life insurance is the least expensive, most guaranteed, and the easiest method of funding for death benefit purposes. 
  1. Corporate Assets: They would have to be accumulated for this purpose, and would likely be included in the valuation, and also would be subjected to taxes during the accumulation stage.  What if the death of the stockholder occurred early after the agreement?  Would there be funds available to fund the liability of the agreement, as there would be a lack of time to accumulate the necessary net profits for the funding?   
  1. External borrowing: Depending on the company’s financial position, it may be possible to fund the purchase price by borrowing.  However, this should be negotiated in advance and before its needed.  Remember, the time to requests funds from an institution is when you don’t need them.  Also, on the other side of this funding element, is the possibility the loan covenant requesting the outstanding note balanced to be called in when there is a dramatic change in ownership and management.    The lending institution may be questioning the ability of the company’s future financial position and the ability to stay profitable.   
  1. Promissory Notes:  If this is going to be used, the terms of the notes should be in the agreement.  Although cash payments are preferable to the seller.   
  1. Combination of cash and promissory notes: Important to note:  Anytime capital is being used by the corporation, it is important not to unreasonably impair the capital of the business. Many state laws prohibit transactions that could impair capital and raise the question of insolvency.  

Without the mention of what funding mechanism is being used in the agreement to repurchase shares, lessens the value of the agreement.  Also, with stated funding, the economic or present value of the redemption price set by the agreement can significantly be reduced, because of inadequate interest or excessive risk leveled on the selling shareholder.   

  

Weak terms in the agreement of the funding mechanism diminishes the value of the agreement from the sellers prospective. However, terms that are too strong can taint the future transactions. What is clear is that it is essential for the parties to discuss the funding mechanism for the triggers of a BSA, keeping in mind both the sellers value position and the purchaser’s ability to fund the costs. 

Why Use Non-Compete Agreements!

by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Buy and Sell Agreements, Funding your Buy and Sell, Income from your business, Inside Sale, Key People_Or Group, Selling Your Business, Uncategorized, Valuation, Value drivers, Working On Your Business

Non-compete agreements (NCA) represent a separate agreement. They could be in an employment contract, or as a separate article in a buy and sell agreement. Sometimes they are referred to as “Covenants not to complete. “

This is based on the possibility that an employee can do harm to a company upon termination.  They could know sensitive information about the company’s operation, owners and employee’s personal information, special operations, and proprietary information to a competing advantage, along with so much more.

Picture a very long-term employee working side by side with the owners, for many years, and then leaving to work for the owner’s competitor.  Certainly, there can be issues.

No compete agreements (NCA), can be used to retain employees also.   It would be very difficult to change jobs within an industry or profession when the leaving employee is limited to compete in a geographic and specific industry for a period of time.  However, non-compete agreements are hard to enforce, because in many instances the agreement has overreached and is very broad in the definition of industry and geographic coverage.

Continue reading “Why Use Non-Compete Agreements!” →

What Status Is The Stock After A Triggering Event?

by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Buy and Sell Agreements, Key People_Or Group, Passive Ownership, Strategies of growing business, Value drivers, Working On Your Business

Chris Mercer author of “Buy-Sell Agreements for Baby Boomers Business Owners” addresses a very good question.  Who owns the stock after the trigger event?  After a trigger event, does the affected shareholders retain the rights, risks and privileges of the ownership, things like, voting, distribution, access to financial information, etc., or are their shares converted to another status, such as (example), the “pending sales of stock” status?

If the shares are converted into the new class or status, do they have the right to receive dividends, or interest while in that pending status, if so, who should be receiving it?

The agreement can also have a clause where the stock that is waiting to be purchased would convert to a “non-voting “status prior to being purchased.

There are many times a stockholder has signed personally for a corporate debt.  The stockholder may desire to have the remaining stockholders make an effort to get the departing stockholder off the note, as they have ceased to be a stockholder.

The questions that Chris puts forth are legitimate issues and should be dealt with when business owners and their council set out to design a buy and sell agreement for the company.

Thank you, Chris Mercer, for bringing these topics to the forefront.

Over the years, many of the buy and sell agreements which I have reviewed over the years, do not address or mention these particular situations, and could create a void should the situation arise.

Check Chris Mercers publications.  He puts out very good information that is useful to practitioners.

Critical Questions That You Need To Answer If You Own A Business!

by YOUR BUSINESS WORTH, posted in Buy and Sell Agreements, Funding your Buy and Sell, Inside Sale, Uncategorized, Valuation, Value drivers, Working On Your Business

Building a business is hard work. Protecting and preserving it is even harder and overlooked by business owners.

While many owners expect family members to take over the business (69%), very few have actually made plans to make sure their wishes are accomplished (26%), even though they realize the importance of estate and succession planning as is an integrated part of that planning.[i]

A succession plan is complex, time consuming and involves attention to details along with many hard questions which need to be answered for a comprehensive and effective succession plan.  It is also the key element in maximizing the return on the investment of your business. This is the big financial payout, the sale of your business.[ii]

SOME MAJOR QUESTIONS AND ISSUES TO ASK YOURSELF!

What if a shareholder wants to sell their interests?

  • Is there a right of refusal for the other owners?
  • What are the financing arrangements?
  • What are the recourses if you fund the buyout especially if the funding is over a long period of time?
  • What is the arrangement if the business fails, how will you get your money if you financed the sale?

 Who steps in your shoes if you want out? 

Not everyone has the luxury of leaving a business when and how they want to.  Things like death, disability, and situations are uncontrollable.

  • What are your contingency plans when a trigger occurs (death, health, non-voluntary situations)?
  • Do other members of the firm have access and authorization to use funds to keep the business going if there is such an event?
  • Does your family take on personal obligations for financial notes and loans you have signed personally to fund your business operation?
  • Do you have estate documents and health care directives, should you have a disability or become incapacitated?

Taxes- and the planning for them Continue reading “Critical Questions That You Need To Answer If You Own A Business!” →